ArticlePloS one2026
Farmers, development agents, and cooperative workers' perspectives on the status, impacts, and solutions of agrochemical adulteration.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of agricultural inputs, such as pesticides and fertilizers, has increased due to agricultural expansion. In developing countries, such as Ethiopia, the agricultural sector is experiencing an expanding demand and consumption of agrochemicals to support the ever-increasing population. The increase in land dedicated to agriculture is accompanied by a rise in agrochemical demand and consumption. The increased demand for agrochemicals may lead to the distribution of low-quality, adulterated, or counterfeit products. To prevent crop loss and minimize the environmental and economic impacts of adulterated products on farmers, it is crucial to investigate their understanding of agrochemical adulteration, its prevalence, and its status. Therefore, this study aimed to assess farmers and agricultural workers, such as field agents and cooperative workers, perspectives on the incidence and impact of agrochemical adulteration in the Wolmera district, located 29 km west of Addis Ababa. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 384 participants through structured interviews. According to the findings, respondents confirmed the existence of adulterated agrochemicals in their local markets, with herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides identified as the most commonly adulterated products. The types of adulteration reported included product dilution and reduced weight. Respondents indicated significant negative impacts, including crop damage, yield reduction, and financial loss, which ultimately eroded farmers' trust in agrochemical usage. To address these challenges, an adulteration regulation mechanism should be in place, the use of technology to identify adulterated or counterfeit products should be encouraged, and accountability for fraud in the value chain should be ensured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.