ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Identification Using Wearable Plantar Pressure: Secondary Cross-Sectional Analysis of Interpretable Framework Integrating Biomechanical Descriptors and the Multiscale Synergy Index.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiographic knee osteoarthritis (ROA) is associated with abnormal plantar loading and altered gait coordination. Insole-based plantar-pressure sensing offers a practical wearable approach to ROA identification, but existing methods typically use either conventional biomechanical descriptors or end-to-end temporal models. An interpretable subject-level framework that captures both local abnormalities and distributed coordination is, therefore, needed. Objective: This study aimed to develop an interpretable subject-level framework that combines conventional biomechanical descriptors with coordination-level plantar information to identify ROA. Methods: In secondary cross-sectional analysis, using a previously reported Pearl River Osteoarthritis Cohort plantar-pressure dataset from our group, we analyzed 92 participants (43 with ROA and 49 without ROA; mean age 63.0, SD 8.4 y). The source cohort was recruited from clinical and nearby community sources at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, between January 2022 and February 2023. We developed an interpretable participant-level classification framework integrating conventional biomechanical descriptors with a coordination-level Plantar Synergy Index (PSI). Participant-wise stratified split allocated 72 participants for 5-fold cross-validation, and 20 for locked independent evaluation. Feature selection used Fisher-score ranking (k=50). All point estimates are accompanied by 2000-iteration bootstrap 95% CIs, and paired model comparisons used DeLong tests. All statistical tests used α=.05. Additional analyses examined feature stability, phase-resolved PSI patterns, robustness to perturbation and design variation, and comparisons with representative end-to-end temporal baselines. Results: The fusion model achieved the best primary classification performance on the independent test set, with an Conclusions: This study introduces an interpretable participant-level representation that integrates local biomechanical loading with multiscale interregional temporal coordination, extending plantar-pressure approaches based on summary descriptors or end-to-end models. Across evaluated settings, the framework showed competitive identification and preliminary robustness. Local biomechanical descriptors constituted the main discriminative basis, whereas PSI contributed a reproducible coordination-level component whose incremental predictive value remains to be established. This broadens plantar-pressure analysis from local loading to distributed coordination. External multicenter prospective validation is required before evaluating the framework as an imaging adjunct for functional assessment and longitudinal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.