ArticlePLoS medicine2026
Protein mediators of chronic kidney disease in Type 2 diabetes: A mendelian randomization study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) occurs in 20-50% of the people living with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide. The cause of CKD is not fully understood, and few interventions prevent CKD in individuals living with diabetes. Here, we use large-scale proteomics data to identify circulating proteins that mediate the relationship between T2D and kidney disorders. METHODS AND
findingsFirst, we used two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) and identified 71 circulating proteins whose levels were altered by genetic predisposition to T2D based on circulating proteomic GWAS from deCODE with 35,559 individuals and T2D GWAS with 80,154 cases. Then, we used cis-genetic variants to proxy the causal effect of some of these T2D-influenced circulating proteins and found that, collectively, five proteins (INHBC, GNPTG, LPO, AGRN, and CTSD) affected three kidney traits (blood urea nitrogen [BUN], estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] and CKD risk) based on GWAS with up to 1,004,040 participants. Notably, we found that higher levels of circulating INHBC protein were estimated to lead to a lower eGFR and higher BUN based on MR analyses. We then replicated this MR analysis with proteomic GWAS from four additional cohorts, namely, UKB-PPP, Fenland, ARIC, and EPIC-Norfolk. We observed a consistent direction of effect across all four proteomic GWAS datasets, supporting the robustness of our results against platform and cohort variation. In observational analyses, increased circulating INHBC levels were associated with increased hazard for kidney disease diagnosis in 37,854 UK Biobank participants. We estimated that circulating INHBC levels mediate 1.3% (95% confidence interval [0.85%, 1.9%]) of the association between T2D and kidney disease diagnosis. There are important limitations in this study. Firstly, although we observed limited evidence for violations to the MR assumptions, some are untestable. Secondly, our study was not based on individuals with diabetic kidney diseases, but rather independent population-based studies assessing diabetes and kidney function separately. Therefore, additional functional analyses in disease specific cohort are needed.
conclusionsCollectively, these findings suggest that T2D influences the risk of CKD, in part, through increased circulating INHBC levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.