ArticlePloS one2026
Therapeutic plasma exchange across multiple organ systems in an Egyptian tertiary center: A seven-year real-world cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReal-world evidence on therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) from low- and middle-income countries remains limited. Egyptian data across multiple organ systems are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the indications, safety, efficacy, and predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing TPE at a tertiary center in Egypt over 7 years. METHODS AND
findingsThis retrospective cohort study included 221 consecutive patients who underwent TPE (2016-2022) at Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt. Patients were stratified into renal, neurologic, hematologic, and metabolic groups. Primary outcomes were clinical response and all-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed. Among 221 patients (57.9% male; mean age 36.0 years), the most frequent indications were Guillain-Barré syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and myasthenia gravis crisis. ASFA category I indications constituted 77.8% of procedures, with response rates decreasing significantly across categories (p = 0.03). Overall response rate was 77.9% (complete remission in 93.0% of responders), with mortality 14.5%. Response rates exceeded 85% in autoimmune hemolytic anemia, hyperviscosity syndrome, and TTP. Neurologic indications achieved 81.6% response; renal indications showed lower response (73.2%) and highest mortality (21.3%). Adverse events occurred in 37.2% of patients, all mild-to-moderate with no session terminations. Independent mortality predictors included mechanical ventilation, creatinine >2.5 mg/dL, renal indication, hemoglobin <8 g/dL, while ASFA category I was protective (all aORs 2.67-5.22). In exploratory analyses, PLASMIC score ≥6 and time to TPE ≤ 2 days were associated with complete remission in TTP, while Hughes score ≥4 and time to TPE > 7 days were associated with poor functional outcome in GBS. These findings require external validation before clinical application. Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (n = 9) demonstrated 100% mortality despite intervention, whereas SLE patients (n = 23) had 52.2% mortality, with 47.8% achieving complete remission or clinical improvement. A three-tier risk model stratified patients into high, intermediate, and low mortality risk groups. Independent predictors of clinical response included neurologic, hematologic, and metabolic indications compared to renal, ASFA category I, and ≥5 TPE sessions, while hemoglobin <8 g/dL and creatinine >2.5 mg/dL predicted poorer response.
conclusionsThis single-center Egyptian TPE cohort demonstrates high efficacy and safety when aligned with ASFA guidelines. Neurologic and hematologic indications achieve optimal outcomes; renal indications and critical illness markers predict poorer prognosis. The PLASMIC score, treatment urgency in TTP and GBS, and the proposed three-tier model represent exploratory findings that, if prospectively validated, could become actionable prognostic tools. These findings suggest that evidence-based TPE expansion in resource-limited settings may be feasible, though multicenter validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.