ArticlePloS one2026
Related memories exhibit interference during learning in adults but later retrieval in children.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To build knowledge, learners of all ages must relate new information to their past experiences. While the interactions among prior and new memories have been extensively studied in adults, they are not yet well characterized in children. There are reasons to expect that children and adults may differ substantially in how related memories interact when memories are first formed as opposed to later referenced, but this has yet to be directly assessed. Here, we had children (4-16 years old) and young adults learn new object locations which either could or could not be incorporated into previously learned two-dimensional maps, i.e., initial memories. Afterwards, they retrieved initial maps from memory. Importantly, initial and new learning occurred on the same day, allowing us to characterize how related spatial memories interact when acquired close in time. We found that during learning, adults but not children were impeded by their recent memories such that they were slower to learn locations within a previously encountered map. However, the opposite developmental pattern emerged at retrieval: Children but not adults demonstrated interference such that they remembered an initial map worse after they had formed new memories within it. Overall, our results suggest that while children and adults may both experience interference among related memories, this interference manifests at different stages: during learning for adults but later memory retrieval for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.