ArticlePloS one2026
Autonomous emergency braking optimal coordination control strategy for commercial buses considering safety and comfort.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional dual-stage warning and dual-grade braking autonomous emergency braking (AEB) control strategy has sudden change in the expected braking deceleration during the switch of working state, which will easily lead to significant longitudinal jerk of the vehicle and affect ride comfort during emergency braking. To solve this problem, an AEB optimal control strategy considering coordination safety and comfort is proposed. First, an in improved Time-To-Collision pre-estimation model was designed, and the AEB state threshold time determination method was proposed by combining vehicle braking process and driver emergency braking characteristics. Second, an AEB hierarchical control strategy was designed, the upper layer designed an expected braking deceleration optimal decision controller based on particle swarm optimization linear quadratic regulator (PSO-LQR), and introduced a comfort time compensation coefficient to rectification the PSO-LQR controller. Moreover, an expected braking deceleration tracking controller based on feedforward and robust integral sliding mode feedback control was designed in the lower layer. Next, an AEB software architecture based on AUTOSAR was designed to enhance the standardization of control strategy software code generation. Finally, the Hardware-in-the-loop test and real vehicle experimental results indicate that the proposed AEB optimal coordination control strategy can meet the safety requirements of emergency collision avoidance functions, and effectively reduce the longitudinal jerk compared to the traditional AEB control strategy, it significantly improves the ride comfort of commercial buses during emergency braking processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.