Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726747›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Physics-informed neural network framework for predicting drilling-induced delamination in GFRP composites.

M Arunadevi, Srinath M S, Murthy B R N, Gowrishankar M C

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M ArunadeviDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Ramaiah institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Srinath M SDepartment of mechanical Engineering, Dayanada Sagar College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Murthy B R NManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5239-0886
Gowrishankar M CManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drilling-induced delamination is one of the most critical defects that affect the structural integrity, dimensional accuracy, and assembly performance of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composites. Accurately predicting delamination is challenging due to the complex nonlinear interactions between machining parameters and interlaminar damage mechanisms. In this study, we developed a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN)-based predictive framework to estimate drilling-induced delamination in GFRP laminates by integrating experimental data with fundamental principles of fracture mechanics. A full-factorial experimental design with 243 drilling trials have been conducted by varying drill point angle, drill diameter, laminate thickness, spindle speed, and feed rate. The delamination factor was evaluated experimentally using image-based measurement techniques. The physics governing thrust-force-induced delamination has been incorporated into the neural network's loss function to ensure consistent and accurate learning. The proposed PINN architecture effectively captured the nonlinear relationship between drilling parameters and delamination behavior, achieving a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9769 and a low root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0048. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the feed rate was the most influential parameter affecting delamination, followed by laminate thickness and drill diameter. Notably, higher spindle speed reduced damage formation due to improved cutting efficiency and decreased thrust force. Further interaction analysis demonstrated significant coupling effects between feed rate and spindle speed, as well as between drill diameter and laminate thickness. The integration of physics-based constraints significantly enhanced the robustness of predictions and the generalization capability compared to conventional data-driven approaches. Our findings confirm that the proposed PINN framework serves as a reliable and physically interpretable tool for predictive modeling, intelligent process optimization, and damage minimization in composite drilling applications.

Indexed as

GlassNeural Networks, ComputerPolymersMaterials TestingSilicon DioxidefiberglassPolymersSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID42726747
PMCPMC13567769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.