ArticlePloS one2026
Digital inequalities in the sharing economy: A qualitative text analysis from focus groups.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sharing economy has transformed access to services through digital platforms and the way people consume them. However, participation remains uneven owing to persistent digital inequalities. This study examines how digital skills and access conditions shape individuals' participation, with particular emphasis on how users perceive and experience these inequalities. A qualitative approach was adopted, based on two focus groups involving 14 participants aged 25-64, conducted in Madrid, Spain, in July 2024. The analysis followed the Gioia methodology and was complemented by exploratory Natural Language Processing techniques to identify recurring terms and named entities in the transcripts. The findings reveal five interrelated dimensions shaping user engagement with platforms such as Uber, Airbnb, and Booking: usability, technology, skills, trust, and other usage limitations. These dimensions show how limited digital skills, usability challenges, access conditions, security concerns, and additional socioeconomic constraints can restrict participation, particularly among users with fewer digital resources or lower levels of digital competence. The study contributes an empirically grounded, user-centered framework for understanding how multiple digital barriers accumulate and shape unequal participation in the sharing economy. It also connects digital inequality research with platform participation by showing that exclusion results not only from limited Internet access or skills, but also from platform design, trust, accessibility, and payment conditions. These findings provide actionable insights for researchers, platform designers, policymakers, and educators seeking to promote more inclusive sharing economy platforms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.