ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Growth and cognition over eight years in three sites of the MAL-ED cohort study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine if height at 2 years, 5 years, and 6-8 years of age was related to school-age cognitive development in low resource settings. Some studies report improved scores in those who catch up, while others found no improvement. We hypothesize that persistent stunting will be negatively associated with cognition and that children who experienced catch-up growth would show improved cognition.Follow-up anthropometry and cognitive assessments at 6-8 years were completed in the Brazil, South Africa, and Tanzania MAL-ED cohorts. Semantic and phonemic fluency and reasoning skills were assessed with the Developmental NEuroPSYchological test and Raven Coloured Matrices, respectively. Stunting at 2, 5, and 6-8 years was used to categorize growth into persistently stunted, early catch-up, late catch-up, and never stunted. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate relationships between linear growth, stunting, and catch-up growth and 6-8-year-old cognition.Stunting prevalence decreased with each follow-up assessment from 40.1% at 2 years to 13.4% at 6-8 years. Height at each age was negatively associated with cognition (Semantic Fluency: 0.2 z-scores, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.3). Persistent stunting was associated with decreased cognitive scores at 6-8 years (Semantic Fluency: -0.4 z-scores, 95% CI: -0.8, -0.03). Children with catch-up growth, both early (Semantic Fluency: -0.4 z-scores, 95% CI: -0.6, -0.1) and late (Semantic Fluency: -0.4 z-scores, 95% CI: -0.8, -0.1), did not have improved scores compared to those persistently stuntedLinear growth at 2 years remains an important indicator of cognitive development in late childhood. Efforts to reduce early stunting may continue as catch-up growth is not always associated with improved cognitive functioning.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.