ArticlePloS one2026
Cross-ecosystem subsidies drive CO2 flux rates in a coastal ecotone.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecotones and the steep environmental gradients they represent are often hotspots of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Consumer activities can mediate ecosystem functions, including decomposition in these hotspots. For example, cross-ecosystem subsidies of marine macrophyte wrack support diverse, productive intertidal food webs on temperate sandy beaches creating hotspots of organic matter processing that are highly vulnerable to growing disturbance threats. As a proxy for wrack decomposition rates, we compared the CO2 flux from the biologically active high tide strandline of bare intertidal beach sands on 14 beaches of California's Northern Channel Islands that varied greatly in the abundance of wrack and macroinvertebrate wrack consumers. Wrack cover (0.03 to 12 m2 m-1) and consumer abundance (339-112,747 individuals m-1) varied by three orders of magnitude across sites. Species richness, biomass, and abundance of wrack-associated macroinvertebrates increased with wrack cover. CO2 flux (0.05 to 1.2 g CO2 m-2 hour-1) was strongly correlated with wrack cover, and wrack consumers likely mediated this relationship. Estimated rates of beach-scale respiration by macroinvertebrate consumers varied over 50-fold among sites (8-449 mg CO2 hour-1 m-1). The estimated fraction of beach CO2 from wrack consumers averaged 11.8%, but ranged from 0.9 to 37.7% among sites. Wrack was the dominant driver of CO2 flux while consumers likely modulated this relationship. Our results demonstrate how strong coupling of subsidies, intertidal consumers, and biogeochemical processes affects a key ecosystem function on sandy beaches, a shoreline ecotone imperiled by rising sea levels and coastal development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.