Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726718›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Cross-ecosystem subsidies drive CO2 flux rates in a coastal ecotone.

Kyle A Emery, Thomas Lenihan, Nicholas K Schooler, Robert J Miller, Henry M Page, Donna M Schroeder, Stephen G Whitaker, David M Hubbard, Jenifer E Dugan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kyle A EmeryMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0536-317X
Thomas LenihanDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Nicholas K SchoolerMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Robert J MillerMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Henry M PageMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Donna M SchroederBureau of Ocean Energy Management, Pacific OCS Region, Camarillo, California, United States of America.
Stephen G WhitakerChannel Islands National Park, U.S. National Park Service, Ventura, California, United States of America.
David M HubbardMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Jenifer E DuganMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecotones and the steep environmental gradients they represent are often hotspots of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Consumer activities can mediate ecosystem functions, including decomposition in these hotspots. For example, cross-ecosystem subsidies of marine macrophyte wrack support diverse, productive intertidal food webs on temperate sandy beaches creating hotspots of organic matter processing that are highly vulnerable to growing disturbance threats. As a proxy for wrack decomposition rates, we compared the CO2 flux from the biologically active high tide strandline of bare intertidal beach sands on 14 beaches of California's Northern Channel Islands that varied greatly in the abundance of wrack and macroinvertebrate wrack consumers. Wrack cover (0.03 to 12 m2 m-1) and consumer abundance (339-112,747 individuals m-1) varied by three orders of magnitude across sites. Species richness, biomass, and abundance of wrack-associated macroinvertebrates increased with wrack cover. CO2 flux (0.05 to 1.2 g CO2 m-2 hour-1) was strongly correlated with wrack cover, and wrack consumers likely mediated this relationship. Estimated rates of beach-scale respiration by macroinvertebrate consumers varied over 50-fold among sites (8-449 mg CO2 hour-1 m-1). The estimated fraction of beach CO2 from wrack consumers averaged 11.8%, but ranged from 0.9 to 37.7% among sites. Wrack was the dominant driver of CO2 flux while consumers likely modulated this relationship. Our results demonstrate how strong coupling of subsidies, intertidal consumers, and biogeochemical processes affects a key ecosystem function on sandy beaches, a shoreline ecotone imperiled by rising sea levels and coastal development.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityBiomassCaliforniaFood ChainInvertebratesSeashoreCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID42726718
PMCPMC13567790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.