ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Caregivers' and healthcare providers' perceptions of blood availability, safety, and acceptability for patients with cancer in southwestern Uganda.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood transfusion is crucial in supporting the treatment of patients with cancer. However, in poor-resource settings, blood and blood components remain scarce, and their perceived health risks may hinder their use. This study explored the perceptions of blood availability, safety, and acceptability among caregivers and healthcare providers of patients with cancer at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in southwestern Uganda. This study employed a qualitative design involving in-depth interviews and key informant interviews with caregivers of patients with cancer and healthcare providers, between September and December 2024. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Of the 30 participants enrolled, 16 were caregivers of patients with cancer (mean age: 36; standard deviation, SD: 10.65 years) and 14 were healthcare providers (mean: 6.5; SD: 5.77 years of practice). Blood availability relied mostly on volunteer donors in educational institutions, and blood shortages were common during school recesses. Other highlighted additional constraints included donor complacency, limited availability of some blood groups, and disruptions during disease outbreaks. While most caregivers trusted that transfused blood was safe, some expressed concerns regarding adverse events and infection risks. Caregivers highly accepted blood transfusion as a life-saving intervention, but concerns relating it to end-of-life care, as well as cultural and religious beliefs were documented, and these were reported to influence transfusion acceptance. These findings reveal persistent blood shortages, with transfusion acceptance influenced by system-level and sociocultural constraints. Since patients with cancer require frequent transfusions, addressing challenges of blood supply and transfusion uptake through coordinated interventions is essential to support cancer care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.