Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726696›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Americans' multidimensional relationship with science: Is citizen science a path forward?

Brooklynn N Joyner, Lincoln R Larson, Caren B Cooper, K C Busch, Corey Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brooklynn N JoynerDepartment of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3809-2417
Lincoln R LarsonDepartment of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9591-1269
Caren B CooperDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
K C BuschDepartment of STEM Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Corey JohnsonDepartment of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivating positive relationships between the public and scientific communities requires understanding how diverse populations relate to science and what strategies promote favorable outcomes. In 2021, we evaluated Americans' relationship with science by examining science beliefs (perceived credibility and value of science) and science connections (science interest, self-efficacy, belonging, and identity) using a demographically-diverse online survey of US residents (N = 1854). Most Americans expressed interest in science (60%) and believed science has value to society (68%). However, women and individuals without a graduate degree were less likely to be interested, and Black Americans were less likely to report value of science. Fewer Americans (39%) felt a sense of belonging to science and only 43% believed science was credible. Citizen science participation was a strong positive correlate of science connections and perceived value of science but inversely associated with perceived credibility of science. Approximately 14% of Americans participated in citizen science, and women, Asian, and Hispanic Americans were underrepresented. Citizen science represents a promising pathway for promoting positive views of science, but it needs to reach diverse audiences, including those already experiencing strained relationships with science, to effectively strengthen relations between science and society.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceScienceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42726696
PMCPMC13567779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.