Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726694›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026

Normative Values of Femoral Inclination Angle and Medial Proximal Femoral Angle: An MRI-Based Study.

Kemal Bugra Memis, Volkan Kızılgöz, Sonay Aydın, Mukadder Sunar, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Önder Durmaz, Ali Osman Gülmez, Berna Hatun Özkan, Mecit Kantarci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kemal Bugra MemisDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0007-6746-3906
Volkan KızılgözDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-711X
Sonay AydınDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3812-6333
Mukadder SunarDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6744-3848
Mehmet Burak GökgözDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0758-5382
Önder DurmazDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1157-2787
Ali Osman GülmezDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7050-1765
Berna Hatun ÖzkanDepartment of Radiology, Giresun Training and Research Hospital, Giresun, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0003-5431-5235
Mecit KantarciDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-6719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to establish normative values for the femoral inclination angle (FIA) and medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which minimizes projectional and rotational errors, in a large cohort. Sex-based and side-to-side comparisons, as well as correlations with age, were also investigated for these proximal femoral angle measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with trauma, infection, prior surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, avascular necrosis, coxa vara, coxa valga, and low-quality magnetic resonance images, 631 pairs of proximal femurs were retrospectively evaluated for FIA and MPFA measurements. All measurements were performed by consensus between 2 radiologists, then analyzed regarding sex and side differences and correlations with age. RESULTS The mean FIA was 128.53±4.62°, whereas the mean MPFA was 86.62±3.40°. No significant differences were observed between men and women (FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050) or between right and left sides (FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853). Age was not significantly correlated with either proximal femoral angle measurement. No significant association was found between age and FIA (right: P=0.554, left: P=0.321) or MPFA (right: P=0.954, left: P=0.935). CONCLUSIONS This large MRI-based study provides normative reference values for FIA and MPFA. Neither angle was significantly influenced by sex, side, or age, suggesting that these parameters remain relatively stable across adult populations. These findings may serve as useful reference values for assessment of proximal femoral morphology and preoperative orthopedic planning.

Indexed as

FemurMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42726694
PMCPMC13580174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.