ArticleThe British journal of surgery2026
Impact of safe-anastomosis digital training on 30-day anastomotic leak after right colectomy: international prospective cohort study (EAGLE-2).
Article in The British journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leak (AL) is the leading cause of major morbidity after right colectomy, affecting 5-10% of patients and accounting for up to one-third of postoperative deaths. The multicentre EAGLE randomized trial demonstrated reductions in AL when surgeons completed a digital safe-anastomosis training package, but its effectiveness outside a trial setting remains untested.
methodsEAGLE-2 was an international prospective cohort study conducted across participating centres over an 8-week intervals (June-September 2024). Consecutive adults undergoing right colectomy surgery with primary anastomosis were included. The EAGLE safe-anastomosis training platform was made open access and surgeons were categorized according to whether they had completed the modules before surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day AL, defined as a defect of intestinal wall integrity at the anastomotic site leading to frank AL and/or intra-abdominal collection. Secondary outcomes included collection alone, training uptake, and implementation of the recommended checklist. Mixed-effects logistic regression adjusting for ASA grade, urgency, and intraoperative contamination was performed with hospital as a random effect.
resultsA total of 2875 patients were recruited across 332 hospitals in 60 countries. Of these, 2242 (78.0%) operations were performed by trained surgeons and 633 (22.0%) by untrained surgeons. AL/collection occurred in 16.4% of the non-trained group versus 9.1% of the trained group, giving a difference of 7.3% (P < 0.001). Adjusted analysis found training was associated with almost a halving of the OR for AL (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.56 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 0.78)), as well as lower reoperation (aOR 0.64) and readmission (aOR 0.65) rates.
conclusionCompletion of a brief digital training programme was associated with a clinically and statistically significant lower rate of AL after right colectomy, alongside lower rates of reoperation, readmission, and death. Scalable digital education should be embedded into colorectal quality improvement programmes worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.