Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726560›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Event-Preserving Neural Network Denoising for Impedance Flow Cytometry.

Leilei Shi, Charlie Jindrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leilei ShiDepartment of Engineering, School of Engineering, Computing, and Mathematics, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9427-4357
Charlie JindrichDepartment of Engineering, School of Engineering, Computing, and Mathematics, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424, USA.

Funding

Office of Integrative Activities OIA-2242812SC EPSCoR 24-GC02South Carolina Research Authority
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impedance flow cytometry (IFC) is a label-free technique for high-throughput electrical characterization of individual cells and other micron-scale particles based on transient impedance changes during passage through microfluidic sensing electrodes. Although lock-in demodulation and low-pass filtering are commonly used for signal conditioning, post-demodulated IFC signals can still contain residual noise, baseline drift, periodic interference, and event-like artifacts that reduce event detectability and distort quantitative features. Here, we present an event-preserving neural network-based denoising framework for post-demodulation IFC signal enhancement. The novelty of this work lies in an IFC-specific event-preserving denoising strategy that combines event-focused sampling and an event-weighted loss to suppress noise while preserving sparse bipolar particle events. A lightweight multilayer perceptron (MLP) was trained and evaluated using paired synthetic noisy and clean IFC signals generated with representative noise and artifact components, and further tested on experimental IFC measurements under challenging noise conditions. Neural network denoising improved event detection, reduced amplitude-estimation error under added white noise, and suppressed experimental baseline and background fluctuations while preserving bipolar event morphology. These results suggest that lightweight neural network denoising can serve as a practical optional enhancement step for noisy post-demodulated IFC signals, potentially supporting more reliable electrical detection and analysis of micro- and submicron-scale particles in impedance-based biosensing applications.

Indexed as

impedance flow cytometryneural networksensingsignal denoisingsingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID42726560
PMCPMC13567230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.