ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Quantitative coronary artery and aortic valve calcification by virtual non-contrast Images from dual-energy delayed CT scans in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the growing use of delayed dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) imaging for extracellular volume assessment, this study aimed to assess the accuracy of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and aortic valve calcification (AVC) quantification in virtual non-contrast (VNC) images derived from delayed DECT images. Eighty-eight patients undergoing pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) cardiac CTA with DECT were retrospectively enrolled. We compared CAC score (CACS), CAC volume, AVC score (AVCS), and AVC volume between true non-contrast (TNC) and VNC images. VNC images were created by subtracting iodine from delayed CT angiography using commercial post-processing software. Concordance for the likelihood of severe aortic stenosis (AS) between TNC and VNC was assessed using guideline-based AVCS thresholds: men > 3,000 AU, women > 1,600 AU (highly likely); men > 2,000 AU, women > 1,200 AU (likely). CACS was lower in VNC than TNC (363.0 [13.7-1,154.0] AU vs. 470.1 [46.8-1,569.9] AU, p < 0.001), but the correlation was excellent (r = 0.966). No significant difference between VNC and TNC was observed in AVCS (959.5 [321.2-2,475.0] AU vs. 1,079.6 [492.2-2,329.4] AU, p = 0.521), with strong correlation (r = 0.966). Application of a correction factor (1.1-fold) improved agreement between VNC- and TNC-derived CACS (weighted κ = 0.839 to 0.869). Diagnostic concordance for severe AS between VNC and TNC was 92.1% (weighted kappa = 0.785) at the "highly likely" threshold and 97.7% (weighted kappa = 0.952) at the "likely" threshold. Delayed VNC images from DECT demonstrate strong agreement with TNC images for CACS and AVCS, suggesting that delayed VNC could potentially reduce the need for TNC acquisition in pre-TAVR assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.