ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026
Burnout Factors for Pediatric Psychologists Across Career Stages.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the prevalence of burnout among healthcare professionals and the drastic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health services, the primary objective of this study was to examine the characteristics of burnout for pediatric psychologists in clinical practice. Additional objectives included identifying personal and systemic factors associated with burnout and comparing burnout factors between early-career (ECP) and mid-/senior-career pediatric psychologists. Participants included 92 active members of the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 54-Society of Pediatric Psychology. Participants completed a survey assessing demographic and professional characteristics and the Affectivity and Burnout Scales (Iverson et al., 1998). In the overall sample, lower positive affectivity, social support, autonomy, higher negative affectivity, and role stress contributed to higher burnout. Among ECPs, younger age, greater non-clinical responsibilities, and higher total hours worked contributed to greater emotional exhaustion in addition to the shared factors affecting burnout. Mid-/senior-career psychologists experienced greater emotional exhaustion compared to ECPs. Affectivity, social support, autonomy, role stress, and burnout contributed to job satisfaction across all career stages. Interventions for decreasing burnout and increasing job satisfaction should target job-related, social, and intrapersonal factors, and be individualized to unique needs of psychologists at different career stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.