Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726426›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

Detection of myocardial infarction by postmortem CT combined with radiomics-based machine-learning analysis.

Nilay Chandra Barman, Aditya Rastogi, Alexander Radbruch, Julian Alexander Luetkens, Daniel Wittschieber, Maria Hahnemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nilay Chandra BarmanInstitute of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Aditya RastogiDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander RadbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Julian Alexander LuetkensDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Daniel WittschieberInstitute of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maria HahnemannDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. maria.hahnemann@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7990-4376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine whether quantitative radiomic features extracted from noncontrast postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) can reliably detect autopsy-confirmed myocardial infarction (MI), and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine-learning models for automated MI detection. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 106 PMCT examinations (55 MI cases, 51 controls). The left ventricular myocardium was semiautomatically segmented, and radiomic features were extracted. After reproducibility filtering (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.75), redundancy reduction based on Spearman correlation (ρ > 0.8), and feature selection were performed within a nested stratified cross-validation framework, including no additional selection (N.S.), random forest (RF)-based ranking, and recursive feature elimination with logistic regression (RFE-LR). Seven supervised machine-learning classifiers were trained and evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and other metrics.

resultsLogistic regression with N.S. achieved the highest performance, with a mean AUROC of 0.817 ± 0.12 (mean ± standard deviation), with accuracy 0.746 ± 0.05, sensitivity 0.764 ± 0.14, and specificity 0.724 ± 0.13. Support vector machines and RF with N.S. showed comparable performance (AUROC 0.814 ± 0.10 and 0.814 ± 0.08, respectively). Across most classifiers, RF-based and RFE-LR feature selection did not improve diagnostic performance compared with N.S. Four radiomic features were identified by both RF and RFE-LR, being selected in at least two outer cross-validation folds.

conclusionRadiomics combined with machine learning demonstrated good performance for MI detection on noncontrast PMCT, emphasizing its potential as an objective, noninvasive tool for cause-of-death assessment, while suggesting a possible translational relevance for clinical contrast-free cardiac imaging. KEY POINTS: Question Can MI detection on PMCT enable cause-of-death determination in forensic medicine and (clinical) pathology, particularly in settings without autopsy? Findings Radiomics-based machine learning on noncontrast PMCT showed good diagnostic performance for MI detection (mean AUROC 0.814-0.817). Relevance Statement Radiomics-based analysis of noncontrast PMCT shows promising potential for the detection of MI without the need for contrast agents or invasive procedures and may support forensic and pathological investigations by enhancing the diagnostic value of routinely acquired PMCT data. However, potential clinical applications require further validation.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMyocardial InfarctionTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAutopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostmortem ImagingRadiomicsRandom ForestReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesForensic imagingMachine learningMyocardial infarctionPostmortem imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID42726426
PMCPMC13569735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.