ArticleActa parasitologica2026
The Evaluation of Surface Charges of Ascaris Lumbricoides, Giardia Duodenalis, and Taenia spp., in Preserved Fecal Samples Processed in Natura.
Article in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveParasite structures eliminated in feces have chemical characteristics resulting from their interactions with the environment in which they are found. These poorly documented physicochemical conditions may interfere with separation techniques used to detect helminth eggs and larvae, as well as protozoan cysts, oocysts, and spores. This interference negatively affects diagnostic protocols for these pathogens, which are generally low to moderate in sensitivity. As such, we sought to evaluate the surface charge by zeta potential (ZP) of the species Ascaris lumbricoides, Giardia duodenalis, and Taenia spp.
methodsWe screened fecal samples that tested positive for these parasites at high intensity. These positive samples were then filtered through tubes containing 400 µm and 200 µm meshes, after which a 500 µL aliquot was diluted with 9 mL of deionized water and centrifuged (490 g / 5 min). This dilution and centrifugation procedure was performed 5 times to obtain a concentrated parasite sediment, which was then transferred to Petri dishes containing 7.5% formalin in deionized water. Eggs and cysts were visualized with stereomicroscopy equipment, captured with a 10 µL micropipette, and stored in Eppendorf tubes (2 mL).
resultsZeta potential values were analyzed with a Zetasizer nano device, and the average data obtained from in triplicate were - 28 mV, - 21.9 mV, and - 18.4 mV for G. duodenalis, A. lumbricoides, and Taenia spp., respectively.
conclusionWe conclude that the negative charges presented on the surfaces of these parasite structures in natural fecal samples can negatively affect laboratory diagnostic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.