ArticlePsychological research2026
When spacing meets color: how executive functions impact the use of perceptual cues during arithmetic problem solving.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mathematical reasoning is grounded in perceptual processing. The current study investigates whether manipulating the perceptual features of arithmetic expressions impacts order of operations problem solving performance, as well as how these effects are associated with individuals' working memory and inhibition skills. The proximity and color similarity within the arithmetic expressions were modified to generate spacing and color cues. Cue congruency was determined by whether the visual modification emphasized the high-order operation (e.g., congruent spacing: 6÷3 - 9; congruent color: 6 ÷ 3 - 9), low-order operation (e.g., incongruent spacing: 6 ÷ 3-9; incongruent color: 6 ÷ 3-9), or neither of them (e.g., neutral: 6 ÷ 3 - 9). Participants solved arithmetic problems online and completed game-like executive function assessments. Results demonstrated that undergraduate students (N = 171) solved problems more accurately and faster when perceptual cues were congruent but less accurately and slower when perceptual cues were incongruent. The effect of spacing cues on problem solving accuracy diminished when color cues were present. More importantly, working memory and inhibition were associated with the effect of perceptual cues on problem solving accuracy differently. Participants with higher working memory were more influenced by incongruent color cues and incongruent spacing cues. Nevertheless, inhibition skills only moderated the effect of color cues (congruent and incongruent) rather than spacing cues. Our findings suggest that advanced math learners' perceptual systems can respond to a broad range of perceptual features (e.g., congruent and incongruent, color and spatial proximity) while interacting with top-down control processes flexibly during arithmetic problem solving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.