ArticlePsychological research2026
Comparing perceptual segmentation in pulsed and unpulsed music with diverse event densities.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Segmentation is a fundamental process in music perception, enabling listeners to identify meaningful boundaries within a continuous auditory stream. This process is crucial for perceiving rhythm and pulse, but more broadly, shapes both cognitive and emotional responses. In pulsed music, a clear, regular beat organises the rhythmic structure (and beat subdivisions as pulses are also normally regular in duration), whereas unpulsed music removes this overt timing reference (e.g., music with expressive rubato; non-isochronous or non-metrical music, traditional or new). While prior research has explored music segmentation, it has usually focused on pulse-driven responses. In this study, we examined how participants segmented diverse pulsed and unpulsed music and assessed the influence of event density (excerpts were grouped into sparse vs. dense groups), onset event patterns, metricality, acoustic features, and personal factors. Sixty-five non-musician participants (defined by non-enrolment in music programmes) listened to 26 musical excerpts and tapped to indicate perceived segmentation points. Bayesian autoregressive time-series analysis of inter-onset intervals revealed that in unpulsed music, segmentation is driven primarily by event density. The acoustic features: spectral centroid, spectral flux, and spectral complexity predicted segmentation boundaries, and RMS (acoustic intensity) showed autoregressive influence up to two lags. We also observed distinct differences in predictive factors between excerpts with sparse and dense event onsets. Personal variables (liking, familiarity, and perceived difficulty of tapping) did not account for additional variance in segmentation. Overall, our findings suggest that listeners use different segmentation strategies for music with sparse versus dense events, opting for a form of structural simplification when confronted with passages characterised by high event density. These results underscore the central role of musical structure in guiding event segmentation, and have implications in both musical and non-musical auditory contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.