ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Palliative Management of Inoperable Vesicovaginal Fistula in Cervical Cancer Patient Using Bilateral Single-J Stents and Bladder Stoma: A Pilot Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisVesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is characterized by the formation of an abnormal connection between the bladder and the vagina, leading to continuous, involuntary leakage of urine through the vaginal canal. For patients with inoperable fistulas, individualized urinary diversion becomes necessary to alleviate incontinence and pelvic pain, thereby enhancing the patient's quality of life. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and clinical benefits of an innovative use of single-J (SJ) stents in conjunction with bladder stomas for palliative management of VVF secondary to cervical cancer treatment. The primary objective of the study is to explore the safety and effectiveness of the urinary diversion in enhancing palliative care for individuals with inoperable VVF.
methodsThis study evaluated 18 cervical cancer patients through purposive sampling. They were diagnosed with VVF at our center between January 2015 and October 2022. The effectiveness of the procedure was measured by comparing preoperative and postoperative data related to incontinence and quality of life, incontinence symptoms were assessed using translated versions of validated questionnaires, namely the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7). Safety was measured by documenting intraoperative and postoperative complications.
resultsAll procedures were successfully completed with minimal blood loss. The mean age was 70.8 ± 12.6 years, and mean fistula diameter was 2.0 ± 0.4 cm. Indications included failed prior repair (n = 10), local tumor recurrence (n = 3), poor surgical candidacy (n = 4), and patient refusal (n = 1). Post-procedurally, QoL scores significantly improved from 43 ± 8 to 72 ± 8. UDI-6 scores decreased from 72 ± 8 to 44 ±7, and IIQ-7 scores decreased from 76 ±6 to 46 ± 7. Daily urine pad usage was reduced to 0-2 pads per 24 h, and outpatient visits for urinary tract infections notably decreased. Complications were mostly grade I (fever, mild hematuria, UTI), with no stent dislodgement or serious adverse events reported during follow-up.
conclusionThe results suggest that the use of bilateral SJ stents and stoma bags for urinary diversion in patients with inoperable complex fistulas is a safe and effective approach. This method appears to positively impact the quality of life for selected patients with VVF, offering a viable palliative solution in cases where traditional surgical interventions are not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.