ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Sex estimation from the mandible in 3D computed tomography images.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to reveal sex-related variable characteristics through morphometric measurements on the mandible and to predict sex in individuals from different age groups using these variables. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted on mandible images obtained through 3D reconstruction (using RadiAnt DICOM viewer) of head and neck computed tomography (CT) scans of 152 individuals (77 males, 75 females) aged between 20 and 98 years. Morphometric measurements were performed for each mandible concerning the foramen mentale, condylus mandibulae, incisura mandibulae, and angulus mandibulae. In addition to these, the bigonial distance was also measured. All measurements except for angulus mandibulae were conducted using RadiAnt DICOM Viewer 2020.1.1. The data were analysed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows.
resultsWhen parameters were compared by sex, the means of all measurements, except for the left angulus mandibulae, were higher in males than in females. Statistically significant differences between sexes were found in the distances from the condylus mandibulae to the gonion on both sides. The highest dimorphism rate was observed in the incisura mandibulae (right: 14.39%, left: 14.29%), while the lowest was found in the angulus mandibulae (right: 0.12%, left: 0.57%). The logistic regression model correctly classified 91.4% of individuals in the development sample, whereas discriminant analysis yielded 90.1% original and 85.5% leave-one-out cross-validated accuracy.
conclusionOur findings indicate that sex estimation can be successfully performed using external measurements of the mandible. According to our findings, important parameters that can be used for sex differentiation, such as the bigonial distance measurement and the gonion-mandibular condyle measurements, are present on the mandible. Our method may be valuable in the fields of anatomy, forensic medicine, and anthropology, particularly for sex estimation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.