ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Fentanyl in forensic autopsies: Trends, circumstances, and toxicological findings.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostmortem fentanyl detection in medicolegal autopsy cases presents a fundamental interpretive challenge: detection does not inherently indicate non-medical use or causal involvement in death. Systematic frameworks for contextualizing fentanyl findings remain underutilized in forensic practice, particularly in settings with limited antemortem documentation.
methodsAll medicolegal autopsy cases with postmortem fentanyl detection between January 2019 and December 2024 at a high-volume metropolitan forensic autopsy institution were retrospectively analyzed. A structured three-tier exposure context classification (consistent with therapeutic indication, non-medical use, or indeterminate) was applied using routinely available autopsy variables including co-detected substances, clinical intervention markers, incident type, and external examination findings.
resultsAmong 842 fentanyl-positive cases, 731 (86.8%) were classified as consistent with therapeutic indication, 68 (8.1%) as non-medical use, and 43 (5.1%) as indeterminate. Annual case numbers increased 87.3% over the study period. Cases meeting combined classical forensic criteria showed 90.5% non-medical classification. Non-medical decedents were markedly younger (mean 32.4 vs. 45.0 years) and more predominantly male (82.4% vs. 76.3%). Amphetamine-type stimulants predominated among co-detected illicit substances; opioid-on-opioid co-detection was rare. Tattoo presence and self-inflicted scarring were significantly more frequent in the non-medical group (p < 0.001).
conclusionA structured, variable-based classification framework can meaningfully stratify postmortem fentanyl cases by exposure context using routinely available autopsy data. Systematic contextual assessment should be a standard component of medicolegal fentanyl investigation across diverse forensic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.