ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2026
Strategies to Overcome Inequities in the Treatment of Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo examine inequities affecting the diagnosis, disease-specific treatment, and supportive care of hematologic malignancies in resource-constrained settings, and to critically evaluate resource-adapted strategies intended to address these barriers. RECENT
findingsEvidence identifies limited access to hematopathology, flow cytometry, cytogenetic and molecular testing, measurable residual disease assessment, and specialized imaging as major diagnostic barriers. Treatment inequities include delayed or of access to effective therapies, limited delivery of risk- or response adapted protocols and inadequate access to transplantation and cell therapy. Tiered diagnostic networks, resource-adapted protocols, quality-assured generics and biosimilars, shared-care models, and selective use of telemedicine may expand access. However, supporting evidence is largely observational and provides limited information on cost-effectiveness, scalability, and survival benefit. Reducing inequities in hematologic cancer care requires prioritizing interventions that directly improve diagnostic and treatment decisions and can be sustained within local resources. Resource-adapted diagnostic pathways, disease-specific treatment protocols, adequate supportive care, patient navigation, and selective digital follow-up provide pragmatic approaches. These interventions should be evaluated using clinically relevant outcomes, including diagnostic accuracy, treatment delay and abandonment, toxicity, cost, and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.