Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726173›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2026

Urinary metabolomics may improve prediction of overall survival beyond tumor stage in colorectal cancer: results from the ColoCare study.

Tengda Lin, Boyi Guo, Victoria M Bandera, David B Liesenfeld, Jincheng Shen, Benjamin Haaland, Paul A Stewart, Kenneth M Boucher, Patricia A Erickson, Sheetal Hardikar and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Tengda LinHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Boyi GuoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Victoria M BanderaHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
David B LiesenfeldDivision of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jincheng ShenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Benjamin HaalandDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Paul A StewartHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kenneth M BoucherHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Patricia A EricksonHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Sheetal HardikarHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Victoria DamerellDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Doratha A ByrdH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jane C FigueiredoDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Health Sciences University, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Adetunji T ToriolaWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
David ShibataDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Erin M SiegelH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Christopher I LiPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alexis B UlrichLukaskrankenhaus Neuss, Neuss, Germany.
Christoph KahlertDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel O Scharfstein *Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Biljana Gigic *Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Cornelia M Ulrich *Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jennifer OseHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. jennifer.ose@hs-hannover.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-9676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Prognosis is primarily guided by tumor stage despite substantial molecular heterogeneity. Urinary metabolomics may capture systemic and tumor-related biology beyond staging and could improve prognostic assessment. We hypothesized that incorporating urinary metabolomic profiles would improve overall survival (OS) prediction performance compared with a stage- and age-based reference model.

methodA total of n = 76 stage I-IV CRC patients recruited as part of the ColoCare Study in Heidelberg Germany with pre-surgery urinary metabolomics were included (23 deaths; median follow-up 3.03 years). Four metabolomics-based penalized Cox models adjusted for tumor stage and age at diagnosis were developed using LASSO, adaptive LASSO, spike-and-slab LASSO, and iterative sure independence screening (iSIS)-LASSO. Model discrimination was assessed using Harrell's C-index and time-dependent AUC based on the nested cross-validation.

resultsCompared with the reference model (Cox model including only tumor stage and age at diagnosis), all metabolomics-based models provided better discrimination. The spike-and-slab LASSO Cox model demonstrated the best performance, achieving a C-index of 0.75 (vs. 0.68) and consistently higher time-dependent AUCs at 1-5 years of follow-up, with a peak AUC of 0.76 at year 3 (vs. 0.68). Three urinary metabolites were consistently selected across all metabolomics-based models: indolelactate, 2-hydroxyisobutyrate and a uridine-like metabolite.

conclusionsUrinary metabolomics may improve CRC OS prediction beyond tumor stage and age at diagnosis, especially with the spike-and-slab LASSO Cox model. These results support urinary metabolomics as a promising noninvasive prognostic tool that merits external validation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsMetabolomicsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorOverall survival predictionPenalized Cox modelsUrinary metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID42726173
PMCPMC13569605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.