Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42726158›Full record

ReviewActa parasitologica2026

Head Lice: A Revised View of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Transmission and Prevalence.

Ian F Burgess

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta parasitologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ian F BurgessMedical Entomology Centre, Insect Research & Development Limited, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK. ian@insectresearch.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0747-3938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead louse transmission is a regular occurrence among children when coming into close contact with others during social activities. During the Covid-19 pandemic most countries instituted lockdown periods resulting in isolation of children away from regular contacts, potentially restricting opportunities for louse transmission. Subsequently there were reports of reduced infestations in children at schools, compared with before the pandemic, with a parallel fall in sales of pediculicidal treatments in several countries beyond the longer-term decline in product sales observed over several years before the pandemic.

methodsFor this narrative review all literature linking Covid-19 and head lice were revisited and re-evaluated.

resultsDespite the increased opportunity for elimination of infestations, some households with no outside contacts reported persistent incidence of head louse infestation and a review of the various studies suggests that most reported changes in head louse prevalence were relatively short lived or even illusory and in countries with low or middle incomes there was little or no difference in prevalence as a result of lockdowns.

conclusionsSome aspects of the social distancing imposed in several countries during the pandemic appear to have continued to have some effect on social interactions of children, particularly in Western countries, with a commensurate slower recovery of head louse prevalence in some communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Lice InfestationsPediculusAnimalsChildHumansPandemicsPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2Covid-19Head liceLockdownsSchoolsTransmission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.