ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Distal course and variability of the spinal accessory nerve: a cadaveric study with surgical implications.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is most vulnerable to injury along its distal extracranial course in the posterior cervical triangle. While proximal anatomy is well described, distal branching patterns and cervical plexus contributions to trapezius innervation remain poorly defined. This study aimed to characterise distal extracranial SAN branching and cervical plexus contributions and to assess whether proximal configurations predict distal trapezial innervation.
methodsTen sides from five adult cadavers were dissected from the emergence of the SAN at the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) to its intramuscular termination in the trapezius. Emergence level, SCM branching pattern (Shiozaki classification), cervical plexus communications, loop formations, and distal branching were recorded. Linear morphometric measurements were obtained where feasible.
resultsThe SAN entered the posterior cervical triangle at variable levels (4.5-8.5 cm from the mastoid). Only Shiozaki Type A and B SCM patterns were identified. Cervical plexus contributions were present in all specimens. An independent cervical branch to the superior trapezius occurred in 6/10 sides, and SAN-cervical loop formation in 2/10 sides. Distal intramuscular branching ranged from two to five terminal branches, with no clear relationship to proximal configuration or measurements.
conclusionDistal SAN anatomy is highly variable and cannot be predicted from proximal patterns or surface landmarks alone, underscoring the need for meticulous identification of both the SAN and cervical contributions during posterior cervical triangle and trapezius-based surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726143What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.