ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Corneal higher-order aberrations in early-onset cataract patients without identifiable risk factors: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate anterior corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and corneal curvature measurements in patients with idiopathic early-onset cataract (EOC) without identifiable risk factors and to compare these findings with those of patients with age-related cataract (ARC) and healthy controls.
methodsThis retrospective case-control study included 180 eyes from 90 subjects: 60 eyes from 30 EOC patients, 60 eyes from 30 ARC patients, and 60 eyes from 30 healthy controls. Subjects with systemic, genetic, or ocular disorders, previous ocular surgery, significant refractive error, regular medication use, smoking, regular alcohol consumption, or other factors that could affect corneal measurements were excluded. Anterior corneal aberrations and corneal curvature parameters were measured using a Scheimpflug-Placido topographer. Linear mixed models were used to account for inter-eye correlation, with group as a fixed factor and age as a continuous covariate. Pairwise post-hoc comparisons were performed only for outcomes with a significant overall group effect, and Holm-Bonferroni adjustment was applied.
resultsAfter adjustment for age and inter-eye correlation, no significant group differences were observed in anterior segment biometric or corneal curvature parameters. Significant group effects were found for the root mean square of higher-order aberrations (RMS HOA), RMS coma, and RMS spherical aberration (RMS SA). RMS HOA and RMS coma were higher in EOC than in healthy controls (0.453 vs 0.287 μm and 0.352 vs 0.189 μm, respectively; adjusted p<0.001). RMS SA was higher in both EOC and ARC than in healthy controls (0.294 μm, 0.260 μm, and 0.092 μm, respectively; adjusted p<0.001). Across these outcomes, no statistically significant EOC-ARC contrasts were detected in the age-adjusted primary models. However, because the observed age ranges of the EOC and ARC groups did not overlap, these comparisons depended on extrapolation to a common age and do not establish equivalence. No significant group effect was found for RMS trefoil or RMS pentafoil.
conclusionsIdiopathic EOC eyes showed higher age-adjusted anterior corneal aberrations, including RMS HOA, RMS coma, and RMS SA, than healthy controls. No statistically significant EOC-ARC contrasts were detected in the age-adjusted models; however, because the observed age ranges of the two groups did not overlap, these comparisons relied on extrapolation and should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence. Corneal aberration assessment may provide additional information in EOC, although these exploratory findings require larger prospective studies before potential implications for cataract surgery planning and IOL selection can be clarified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42726114What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.