ArticleJournal of global health2026
Revolutionising healthcare access: student-led clinics as catalysts for change in an underserved urban community in Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Karachi, Pakistan's largest metropolitan city, faces profound healthcare disparities, with an estimated 45-49% of the population residing in underserved informal settlements. Within these communities, the primary healthcare system is not merely under-resourced but structurally fractured, leaving patients to navigate prohibitively expensive private providers or overcrowded public hospitals. To address these systemic gaps, the Humanity Initiative, a student-led non-governmental organisation, implemented student-led clinics (SLCs) as a community-embedded, cost-effective model to bridge critical care deficits. Methods: We conducted a descriptive study examining the implementation and early outcomes of two SLCs conducted in Agra Taj Colony, Lyari Town, Karachi. Operating every three weeks under licensed physician supervision, each SLC provided free primary consultations, dispensed essential medications, and delivered structured health education. We analysed patient demographics, disease burden, operational costs, and process-level indicators across both clinic cycles. Results: A total of 371 patients were seen across SLC1 (n = 194) and SLC3 (n = 177), with a higher proportion of female patients (n = 224, 60.4%). The disease burden was dominated by non-communicable diseases, including hypertension (14.3%) and diabetes (8.6%), alongside a notable number of acute infections and multi-system complaints reflecting the dual epidemiological burden characteristic of urban low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. Operational costs were maintained at PKR 128-136 (USD 0.45-0.48) per patient, demonstrating exceptional cost-efficiency. We found significant gaps in health literacy, particularly regarding chronic disease self-management, and gendered barriers to healthcare access. Conclusion: The SLC model demonstrates proof-of-concept as a viable, scalable strategy for bridging structural gaps in fractured primary healthcare systems in LMICs. By embedding care within the community, SLCs advance Universal Health Coverage, rebuild community trust in allopathic medicine, and provide supervised experiential learning opportunities for future healthcare professionals. Replication of this model across similar underserved communities holds significant potential for reducing healthcare inequity in resource-constrained urban settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.