ArticleHealth promotion international2026
'Putting profit over people': Australian women's perceptions of the economic and commercial systems shaping women's health and social inequities.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The commercial determinants of health are important drivers of population health, although their influence on women's health and social inequities remain underexplored. This study explored Australian women's perceptions of how economic and commercial factors influence women's health and wellbeing and the actions needed to address these influences and advance gender equity. An online qualitative survey was completed by 506 Australian women aged 18 years and over. Data were analysed using a reflexive approach to thematic analysis. Women described health and social inequities as arising from interconnected economic, commercial, political, and gendered systems. Four themes were constructed from the data. First, women described financial barriers that limited access to essential goods, services, and healthcare. Second, they linked workplace practices, including inflexible work, insecure employment, and discrimination, to poorer health and wellbeing. Third, they identified a range of gendered, social, and environmental harms associated with industries they believed prioritized profit over health. Finally, participants called for stronger government regulation, greater corporate accountability, improved workplace protections, and more equitable access to healthcare and essential services. Findings highlight the need for public health responses that address the broader economic, commercial, and political systems shaping women's health and social inequities. Recognizing women as experts in their own lives can strengthen research, policy, and advocacy and support approaches that prioritize health and wellbeing over commercial interests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.