Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725583›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2026

Splenic hilum nodal involvement in resected left-sided pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis.

Caro L Bruna, Charlotte E Baggerman van Houweninge, Faridi S Jamaludin, Guiseppe Malleo, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Marc G Besselink, Jony van Hilst

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caro L BrunaDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-9556-1308
Charlotte E Baggerman van HouweningeDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Faridi S JamaludinMedical Library, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Guiseppe MalleoDepartment of Surgery, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Mohammad Abu HilalDepartment of Surgery, The University of Jordan, School of Medicine, Amman, Jordan.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2650-9350
Jony van HilstDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4990-445X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSplenectomy is standard of care during left pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to obtain adequate lymphadenectomy. However, evidence supporting this approach is lacking. Splenic preservation would reduce short-term morbidity and is essential for emerging oncological adjunctive therapies, including immunotherapy and personalized cancer vaccines. This study reviewed the incidence of splenic hilum nodal involvement (SHNI) in left-sided PDAC.

methodsA systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed, identifying studies published from inception to July 2026. Outcomes of interest were the rate of SHNI (station 10), overall survival, and the rate of splenic artery nodal involvement (SANI; station 11). Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses for SHNI were performed per tumour localization (pancreatic neck, body, tail).

resultsAmong 2776 screened studies, 22 with 2260 patients undergoing left pancreatectomy for PDAC were included. The pooled prevalence of SHNI was 3.7% (95% confidence interval (c.i.) 2.2% to 6.2%); 1.1% for pancreatic body PDAC (95% c.i. 0.3% to 4.3%) and 9.7% for pancreatic tail PDAC (95% c.i. 3.5% to 24.0%). SHNI was not significantly associated with survival (pooled hazard ratio 2.05; 95% c.i. 0.89% to 4.72; P = 0.072). The pooled prevalence of SANI was 39.1% (95% c.i. 25.1% to 55.1%).

conclusionIn patients undergoing left pancreatectomy for PDAC, the presence of SHNI is rare, particularly in pancreatic body cancer (1.1%). These findings suggest that the relevance of routine splenectomy remains unclear, especially for pancreatic body PDAC. However, because the quality of current evidence is low, further investigation in prospective studies is required.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsSpleenHumansLymph Node ExcisionSplenectomySplenic Arterydistal pancreatectomyleft-sided pancreatectomylymph node metastasispancreatic ductal adenocarcinomasplenectomy

Identifiers

PMID42725583
PMCPMC13563183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.