ArticleSports health2026
Effects of Quadriceps Strength Recovery in the First Year After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Gait Biomechanics.
Article in Sports health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAberrant walking biomechanics, a factor linked to knee osteoarthritis (KOA), are common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Although quadriceps weakness often persists after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), the extent to which strength recovery influences gait biomechanics over the first postoperative year, a critical window for implementing rehabilitation strategies, remains unclear. HYPOTHESIS: Distinct quadriceps strength recovery trajectories will emerge after ACLR, with the lesser strength recovery group exhibiting more aberrant gait biomechanics compared with the greater strength recovery group and controls. STUDY
designProspective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.
methodsOf 62 enrolled patients with a primary ACL injury, 59 were eligible and matched with uninjured controls by sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). Quadriceps strength was assessed preoperatively and at 4, 6, and 12 months post-ACLR, and gait biomechanics, including vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), knee flexion angle (KFA), knee extension moment (KEM), and knee adduction moment (KAM), were assessed at 4, 6, and 12 months post-ACLR. Group-based trajectory modeling identified strength recovery profiles, and functional mixed effects modeling compared gait biomechanics between strength trajectory groups and controls.
resultsTwo distinct strength trajectories were identified. Both the weaker (N = 31) and stronger (N = 28) ACLR groups demonstrated lesser vGRF during early stance compared with controls, with maximum differences reaching -0.15 body weight (BW). Compared with the stronger group, the weaker group exhibited lesser KFA (-1.85° and -2.18° at 6 and 12 months) and KEM (0.006 BW × height at 4 and 6 months) during early stance. Compared with healthy controls, both ACLR groups exhibited lesser KFA and KEM during early stance across postoperative timepoints, with larger and more persistent differences observed in the weaker group. Only the weaker group had significantly lower KAM relative to controls (0.006 to 0.007 BW × height at 4, 6, and 12 months).
conclusionAlthough the stronger group exhibited more dynamic gait waveforms than the weaker group, walking biomechanics were not fully normalized to those of healthy controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings highlight the need for complementary interventions to strength training during the first year post-ACLR to target aberrant biomechanics and potentially reduce long-term KOA risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.