ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2026
[Expression of Concern] Rapamycin‑induced miR‑30a downregulation inhibits senescence of VSMCs by targeting Beclin1.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of PANoptosis in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- ExpressionOfConcernFor
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the publication of the above paper, it was drawn to the Editor's attention by an interested reader that a pair of unsuitable antibodies may have been used as a part of the western blot analysis shown in Fig. 1E on p. 1314. First, the antibody with the catalogue number ab51243 (purchased from Abcam), is not specific for p16‑INK4a (the senescence‑associated protein studied in this paper), but a totally different protein with a similar name, p16‑ARC. A concern was also raised regarding the anti‑β‑galactosidase antibody (cat. no. ab9361; Abcam) that was employed, which is specific for the bacterial protein and is only distantly related to human β‑galactosidase according to its sequence (neither is this antibody the closest homologue to bacterial β‑galactosidase in the human proteome). The authors have been contacted by the Editorial Office to offer an explanation for the selection of these apparently unsuitable antibodies for the western blot analysis, and we are awaiting their response. Owing to the fact that the Editorial Office has been made aware of a potential problem surrounding the design of these experiments in this study, we are issuing an Expression of Concern to notify readers of this issue while the Editorial Office continues to investigate this matter further. [International Journal of Molecular Medicine 43: 1311‑1320, 2019; DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4074].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.