Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725341›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2026

Geographic patterns of ovarian tissue cryopreservation utilisation across age groups in a nationwide multicentre cohort.

Norah L A Emrich, Rebekka Einenkel, Cara M Färber, Andreas Schallmoser, Nicole Sänger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Norah L A EmrichDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1705-1536
Rebekka EinenkelDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8049-2778
Cara M FärberDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Andreas SchallmoserDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1128-2376
Nicole SängerDepartment of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes geographic proximity to a centralised cryobank reflect age-dependent differences in ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) utilisation? SUMMARY ANSWER: Paediatric patients resided significantly closer to the cryobank than adolescents and adult women, suggesting age-dependent geographic differences in the utilisation of fertility preservation services. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: OTC is an established fertility preservation option, and previous studies have primarily focused on return rates of cryopreserved ovarian tissue and subsequent pregnancy and live birth outcomes. However, less is known about utilisation patterns of fertility preservation, particularly for OTC in paediatric oncology, where utilisation may be influenced by factors such as clinician-initiated counselling and local referral pathways. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This retrospective nationwide multicentre cohort study included 2,426 patients referred from 124 centres who underwent OTC at a central cryobank between 2000 and 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsPatients were stratified into children (<15 years, n = 149), adolescents (15-19 years, n = 296), and adults (≥20 years, n = 1,981). Residential addresses were geocoded, and distances to the cryobank were calculated. Regional distribution was categorised by population size. Statistical analyses included Chi-square and non-parametric tests with Bonferroni correction. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Median distance to the cryobank increased with age (children: 136 km; adolescents: 183 km; adults: 222 km), with children living significantly closer than adolescents ( LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective design precludes causal inference. Distances were calculated as straight-line measures instead of real travel time, and socioeconomic factors were not available. Furthermore, only patients who successfully underwent OTC were available for analysis. Consequently, the study cannot assess true access to fertility preservation, referral rates, counselling rates, or the number of eligible patients who did not proceed to treatment. Although patients were referred from centres across Germany, cryopreservation was centralized in Bonn. Regional referral relationships and the structure of the referral network may therefore have influenced the observed geographic distribution, particularly in paediatric patients, and may limit generalisability to the entire German population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe findings demonstrate age-dependent geographic utilisation patterns among patients who underwent OTC. These patterns may reflect differences in referral pathways, counselling practices, and utilisation of fertility preservation services. However, because only patients who successfully underwent OTC were included, the study cannot directly assess referral rates, unmet need, or access barriers. Expanding structured referral pathways and reimbursement policies may improve equitable utilisation of fertility preservation services.

fundingIntramural funding from the University Hospital Bonn. This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Bonn. No external grant funding was received from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. DISCLOSURES: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

fertility preservationfertility utilisationgeographic disparitiesoncofertilityovarian tissue cryopreservationpaediatric patientsreferral networksurban–rural differences

Identifiers

PMID42725341
PMCPMC13561524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.