ArticleGland surgery2026
Ultrasound radiomics for preoperative prediction of high axillary nodal burden in node-positive breast cancer: comparison of intratumoral and peritumoral features with external validation.
Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate preoperative assessment of axillary nodal burden is important for individualized axillary management, but conventional ultrasound and needle biopsy have limited ability to characterize the overall nodal burden. This study aimed to develop and externally validate ultrasound radiomics models for preoperative prediction of high axillary nodal burden in node-positive breast cancer and to compare the value of intratumoral and peritumoral features. Methods: This retrospective dual-center study included 404 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis, including 294 patients in the training cohort and 110 in the external validation cohort. Axillary nodal burden was categorized as low burden (1-2 metastatic lymph nodes) or high burden (≥3 metastatic lymph nodes) according to postoperative pathology. Intratumoral and 3-mm peritumoral ultrasound radiomics features were extracted. To avoid information leakage, the training and validation cohorts were separated before preprocessing and model development. Six prespecified models were developed in the training cohort and independently evaluated in the external validation cohort. Results: Cortical thickening, hilum status, and ultrasound-reported axillary lymph node status were independent clinical predictors of high nodal burden. In external validation, all models showed limited discrimination, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.585 to 0.621. The intratumoral radiomics model achieved the numerically highest validation AUC of 0.621, with a sensitivity of 0.762 and specificity of 0.382, followed by the combined models (AUC =0.613), clinical model (AUC =0.597), and peritumoral model (AUC =0.585). Bootstrap comparisons showed no significant differences between models. Calibration performance was suboptimal in the external validation cohort. Conclusions: Under a leakage-free external validation framework, ultrasound radiomics showed limited but exploratory value for predicting high axillary nodal burden in node-positive breast cancer. The current models should not be used as standalone tools for axillary management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.