Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725297›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT

The social relevance of occupational medical examinations in Brazil.

Eduardo Myung, José Domingos-Neto, Fernando Akio Mariya, Alexander Buarque, Ricardo Lupianhes Pacheco, Marcia Bandini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eduardo MyungUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-2040
José Domingos-NetoHospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz (HAOC), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-8660
Fernando Akio MariyaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-419X
Alexander BuarqueCentro de Estudos Augusto Leopoldo Ayrosa Galvão (CEALAG), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-4015
Ricardo Lupianhes PachecoAssociação Brasileira de Empresas de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho (ABRESST), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5918-6785
Marcia BandiniUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2899-090X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brazilian Bill No. 1,083/2021 highlights the need to reflect on the foundations, values, and objectives of occupational medical examinations. This essay, addressed to occupational physicians as well as other members and leaders of Brazilian society, discusses the importance and fundamental objectives of occupational medical examinations as an epidemiological and preventive tool aimed at promoting, monitoring, and conducting surveillance of workers' overall health, with the potential to benefit public health and Brazilian society. The objectives and potential of occupational medical examinations extend beyond their medicolegal functions related to assessing fitness for work or establishing a causal relationship between disease and work. Occupational medical examinations are not an end in themselves but rather an entry point to multiple care pathways aimed at the prevention, monitoring, and comprehensive health care of workers. These actions encompass both asymptomatic workers exposed to risk factors for illness and those who already exhibit early signs of adverse health effects, while also including preventive ergonomic interventions, investigations of occupational accidents and work-related diseases, among others. The planning of these care pathways, priority setting, resource allocation, and evaluation of their effectiveness depend on epidemiological data obtained through occupational medical examinations. In this context, technical position statements issued by institutions representing occupational health can contribute to building consensus and advancing best practices related to occupational medical examinations. The authors advocate the rejection of Brazilian Bill No. 1,083/2021, as they consider its approval a setback in the historical evolution of occupational medical examinations.

Indexed as

occupational healthoccupational health policyoccupational health programpublic health

Identifiers

PMID42725297
PMCPMC13561417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.