ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, perceived stress, and miscarriage risk in a cohort of US Black women.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) can disrupt hormonal and metabolic processes that support healthy pregnancy. PFAS exposure has been associated with miscarriage risk, but less is known about exposure to multiple PFAS and psychosocial stress measured at preconception, especially among Black women. Methods: We used prospective data from 538 participants from the Study of Environment, Lifestyle, and Fibroids who self-identified as Black or African American. At baseline (preconception), we measured six PFAS concentrations in plasma samples, and participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) (higher scores reflect greater stress). Participants reported pregnancy outcomes at follow-up study visits (~20, 40, and 60 months). We used Cox proportional hazards models, with gestational week as the time scale, to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) characterizing miscarriage risk associated with PFAS concentrations and perceived stress scores. We also used the survival extension of quantile-based g-computation to estimate associations of the mixture (PFAS and perceived stress scores) with miscarriage risk. Results: Ninety-five miscarriages were reported during follow-up. In Cox models, perfluorohexanesulfonic acid was associated with 99% (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.10, 3.58) and 52% (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.73, 3.17) higher miscarriage risk at the 50th-74th and ≥75th percentiles (vs. <50th percentile), respectively. Other PFAS showed little association with miscarriage risk. Perceived stress scores (per 1-standard deviation increase) were associated with 23% (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.98, 1.53) higher miscarriage risk. The mixture was nonlinearly associated with miscarriage risk, but associations were imprecise. Conclusions: Higher perfluorohexanesulfonic acid concentrations and perceived stress scores were associated with miscarriage risk among Black women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.