Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725255›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, perceived stress, and miscarriage risk in a cohort of US Black women.

Samantha Schildroth, Birgit Claus Henn, Victoria Fruh, Amelia K Wesselink, Anissa I Vines, Alexander P Keil, Chandra L Jackson, Anne Marie Jukic, Quaker E Harmon, Ganesa Wegienka and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Samantha SchildrothDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachussetts.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-3566
Birgit Claus HennDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachussetts.
Victoria FruhDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachussetts.
Amelia K WesselinkDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachussetts.
Anissa I VinesDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Alexander P KeilOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Chandra L JacksonEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.
Anne Marie JukicEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.
Quaker E HarmonEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.
Ganesa WegienkaHenry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Lauren A WiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachussetts.

Funding

Uterine LeiomyomasZIAES049013 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JUKIC, ANNE MARIE · 2009 to 2025
$14.7M
Endocrine disrupting chemicals and risk of uterine fibroids: a prospective studyR01ES024749 · NIEHS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LAUREN A WISE · 2015 to 2026
$4.8M
A Prospective Study of Per-and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Mixtures and Pregnancy Outcomes among Black WomenK99ES036288 · NIEHS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Samantha Schildroth · 2025 to 2026
$242k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES049013NIEHS NIH HHS K99 ES036288NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) can disrupt hormonal and metabolic processes that support healthy pregnancy. PFAS exposure has been associated with miscarriage risk, but less is known about exposure to multiple PFAS and psychosocial stress measured at preconception, especially among Black women. Methods: We used prospective data from 538 participants from the Study of Environment, Lifestyle, and Fibroids who self-identified as Black or African American. At baseline (preconception), we measured six PFAS concentrations in plasma samples, and participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale-4 (PSS-4) (higher scores reflect greater stress). Participants reported pregnancy outcomes at follow-up study visits (~20, 40, and 60 months). We used Cox proportional hazards models, with gestational week as the time scale, to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) characterizing miscarriage risk associated with PFAS concentrations and perceived stress scores. We also used the survival extension of quantile-based g-computation to estimate associations of the mixture (PFAS and perceived stress scores) with miscarriage risk. Results: Ninety-five miscarriages were reported during follow-up. In Cox models, perfluorohexanesulfonic acid was associated with 99% (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.10, 3.58) and 52% (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.73, 3.17) higher miscarriage risk at the 50th-74th and ≥75th percentiles (vs. <50th percentile), respectively. Other PFAS showed little association with miscarriage risk. Perceived stress scores (per 1-standard deviation increase) were associated with 23% (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.98, 1.53) higher miscarriage risk. The mixture was nonlinearly associated with miscarriage risk, but associations were imprecise. Conclusions: Higher perfluorohexanesulfonic acid concentrations and perceived stress scores were associated with miscarriage risk among Black women.

Indexed as

Black womenEDCsmiscarriagemixturesPFASstress

Identifiers

PMID42725255
PMCPMC13561289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.