ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) remain a major therapeutic challenge with limited curative options. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a potential adjunct to systemic therapy, but its survival benefit remains uncertain. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Embase were searched through 16 June 2025. Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.4. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for binary outcomes, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Results: Out of 4625 records screened, three studies comprising 614 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated that RFA combined with systemic therapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36-0.60, Conclusions: RFA combined with systemic therapy is associated with improved OS and PFS, with a trend toward reduced mortality and disease progression compared with systemic therapy alone among patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. These findings suggest a potential role for RFA in multimodal treatment; however, they should be interpreted cautiously given the limited and heterogeneous evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.