ArticleEnvironmental research. Water2026
State of nutrient management infrastructure of lagoons wastewater systems serving small communities in the U.S.
Article in Environmental research. Water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of nutrients in effluent from wastewater treatment lagoons discharging to surface water in the United States.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lagoon wastewater treatment systems remain the backbone of sanitation in many small U.S. communities, yet their treatment technologies and nutrient management performance remain poorly characterized. Using publicly available federal and state datasets supplemented by permit reviews, this study evaluated the existing nutrient management infrastructure for municipal lagoon wastewater systems serving communities with less than 10 000 residents. Of all lagoon systems identified, approximately 69% of facilities operate at less than 0.1 million gallons per day. Non-aerated lagoons accounted for about 61% (2512 facilities), while aerated systems were present in 1697 facilities. Nutrient permitting was inconsistent throughout the U.S., where parameters such as total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were frequently monitored but seldom subject to enforceable limits, constraining performance benchmarking and compliance comparability. Effluent data (2020-2024) showed moderate organics and suspended solids control but substantial variability in ammonia, TN, and TP, with many facilities exceeding limits typical of nutrient-sensitive watersheds. Facilities with nutrient-specific upgrades including moving bed biofilm reactors and fixed-bed attached growth reactors, consistently achieved low effluent ammonia and TN while chemical precipitation provided the most reliable TP reduction. Life cycle assessment of the operations phase indicated higher carbon and eutrophication footprints for facultative and aerated lagoons, whereas targeted nutrient management upgrades balanced nutrient removal and energy efficiency, lowering environmental impact profiles. The findings of this study underscore the need for improved influent data collection efforts and nutrient permitting as a driver for compliance. Priorities for practice include leveraging routine monitoring datasets to bolster compliance oversight and integrating decision-making frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.