Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725151›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Deep learning techniques for extreme rainfall prediction: a review of state-of-the-art.

Braiton U Mukhalela, Serestina Viriri, David Ndzi, Michael Gebreslasie, Muhammad Zeeshan Shakir, Naeem Ramzan, Fahad Ayaz, Mary Lynch, Llinos Haf Spencer, Saloshni Naidoo and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Braiton U MukhalelaDiscipline of Computer Science, School of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Serestina ViririDiscipline of Computer Science, School of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
David NdziSchool of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Portsmouth, England, United Kingdom.
Michael GebreslasieDiscipline of Geography, School of Agriculture and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Muhammad Zeeshan ShakirSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, United Kingdom.
Naeem RamzanSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, United Kingdom.
Fahad AyazSchool of Computing, Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, United Kingdom.
Mary LynchRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Llinos Haf SpencerRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Saloshni NaidooDiscipline of Public Health, Institute for Global Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Nisha Nadesan-ReddyDiscipline of Public Health, Institute for Global Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Ozayr MahomedDiscipline of Public Health, Institute for Global Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Natalie DickinsonSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, United Kingdom.
Fiona HenriquezCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extreme rainfall events (ERES) are among the most challenging hydro-meteorological phenomena to forecast because the complex, nonlinear atmospheric processes involved span multiple spatial and temporal scales and are further intensified by rising climate variability. While Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models offer physically consistent representations of atmospheric dynamics, they still struggle to resolve localized convection, rapidly evolving storm systems, and rare, high-intensity precipitation events. This study systematically reviews recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for extreme rainfall prediction published between 2020 and 2026, using a transparent literature search strategy, predefined screening criteria, quality assessment, and a structured literature review matrix. The review synthesizes evidence from a final evidence base of 139 studies across several dimensions, including deep learning (DL) methodologies, multimodal data fusion, forecasting horizons, operational deployment, uncertainty quantification, and emerging intelligent forecasting paradigms. The analysis reveals a transition from deterministic DI models to hybrid, physics-informed, uncertainty-aware, and operational forecasting systems that increasingly integrate AI with physical knowledge and heterogeneous environmental observations. Despite notable progress, persistent challenges remain, including data scarcity, class imbalance, model generalization, physical consistency, uncertainty estimation, transferability, and the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks. This review provides a unified synthesis of current methodologies. It identifies key research gaps, highlighting the need for evaluation frameworks that address physical plausibility, uncertainty quantification, reliability, transferability, and operational relevance. The findings indicate that future extreme rainfall prediction systems should advance beyond accuracy-focused evaluation toward integrated, trustworthy, uncertainty-aware, and physically consistent forecasting approaches.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningearly warning systemsextreme rainfall predictionmultimodal data fusionnumerical weather predictionoperational forecastingphysics-informed learning

Identifiers

PMID42725151
PMCPMC13560874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.