ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Deep learning techniques for extreme rainfall prediction: a review of state-of-the-art.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme rainfall events (ERES) are among the most challenging hydro-meteorological phenomena to forecast because the complex, nonlinear atmospheric processes involved span multiple spatial and temporal scales and are further intensified by rising climate variability. While Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models offer physically consistent representations of atmospheric dynamics, they still struggle to resolve localized convection, rapidly evolving storm systems, and rare, high-intensity precipitation events. This study systematically reviews recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for extreme rainfall prediction published between 2020 and 2026, using a transparent literature search strategy, predefined screening criteria, quality assessment, and a structured literature review matrix. The review synthesizes evidence from a final evidence base of 139 studies across several dimensions, including deep learning (DL) methodologies, multimodal data fusion, forecasting horizons, operational deployment, uncertainty quantification, and emerging intelligent forecasting paradigms. The analysis reveals a transition from deterministic DI models to hybrid, physics-informed, uncertainty-aware, and operational forecasting systems that increasingly integrate AI with physical knowledge and heterogeneous environmental observations. Despite notable progress, persistent challenges remain, including data scarcity, class imbalance, model generalization, physical consistency, uncertainty estimation, transferability, and the lack of standardized evaluation frameworks. This review provides a unified synthesis of current methodologies. It identifies key research gaps, highlighting the need for evaluation frameworks that address physical plausibility, uncertainty quantification, reliability, transferability, and operational relevance. The findings indicate that future extreme rainfall prediction systems should advance beyond accuracy-focused evaluation toward integrated, trustworthy, uncertainty-aware, and physically consistent forecasting approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.