Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725126›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

HawkesRank: Event-driven centrality for real-time importance ranking.

Didier Sornette, Yishan Luo, Sandro Claudio Lera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Didier SornetteInstitute of Risk Analysis, Prediction and Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-7962
Yishan LuoInstitute of Risk Analysis, Prediction and Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4511-9812
Sandro Claudio LeraInstitute of Risk Analysis, Prediction and Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1359-565X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying influence in networks is important across science, economics, and public health, yet widely used centrality measures remain limited: they rely on static representations, heuristic network constructions, and purely endogenous notions of importance, while offering little semantic connection to observable activity. We show that influence can instead be interpreted through multivariate Hawkes point processes that model exogenous drivers and endogenous amplification (self- and cross-excitation). This yields a principled, empirically calibrated, and adaptive notion of importance grounded in observable event dynamics. Classical indices such as Katz centrality and PageRank emerge as stationary mean-field limits of this formulation, clarifying both their interpretation and their limitations. Unlike static averages, the resulting rankings are determined by instantaneous event intensities, allowing rankings to adapt to shocks while distinguishing endogenous amplification from exogenous activity. Using both simulations and empirical analysis of emotion dynamics in online communication platforms, we show that this event-driven formulation captures temporally evolving system activity more effectively than static centrality metrics.

Indexed as

dynamic centralityevent-driven modelsHawkes processesinformation diffusionnetwork ranking

Identifiers

PMID42725126
PMCPMC13560081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.