Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725092›Full record

ArticleCell reports. Physical science2026

Explainable AI reveals the allosteric blind spot in protein-ligand binding predictions.

Vedant Parikh, Brandon Foley, Will Gatlin, Max Ludwick, Lucas Turano, Gennady M Verkhivker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports. Physical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vedant ParikhKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Brandon FoleyKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Will GatlinKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Max LudwickKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Lucas TuranoKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Gennady M VerkhivkerKeck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.

Funding

Probing real-time conformational dynamics and allosteric cooperativity of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein during virus entryR01AI181600 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH CTR AT TYLER · PI Maolin Lu · 2024 to 2026
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI181600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed prediction of protein structure and interactions, yet modeling of allosteric binding remains a persistent challenge. We develop an explainable AI framework that interrogates AI models AlphaFold3, Protenix, Boltz-2, Chai-1, and DynamicBind on rigorously stratified datasets of orthosteric and allosteric ligand-protein complexes. While AI models excel in accurate modeling of orthosteric ligand binding, a consistent and substantial performance gap observed across diverse architectures emerges in prediction of allosteric complexes. The biophysical logic for this dichotomy is unveiled through physics-based lens of the energy landscape theory. Orthosteric binding creates dominant energetic funnels via ligand-induced minimal frustration quenching, while allosteric sites preserve neutral frustration landscapes in both apo and holo protein states. By linking prediction outcomes to frustration landscapes, this study recasts AI shortcomings in prediction of allosteric ligand binding as diagnostic indicators of allostery, establishing a physics-informed framework that turns the allosteric blind spot into mechanistic insight.

Identifiers

PMID42725092
PMCPMC13560746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.