Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42725056›Full record

ArticleData in brief2026

A weighted sentiment dataset for Indonesian telemedicine text classification.

Fakhri Wahid Athallah, Ihya Choerul Ulumudin, Rhio Sutoyo, Esther Widhi Andangsari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fakhri Wahid AthallahComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia.
Ihya Choerul UlumudinComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia.
Rhio SutoyoComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia.
Esther Widhi AndangsariPsychology Department, Faculty of Humanities, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digital era has fundamentally transformed the global healthcare paradigm. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines digital health as the utilization of information and communication technologies (ICT) to enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and accessibility of healthcare services. Consequently, Indonesia's e-health market is projected to reach US$ 3.6 billion by 2031. This growth is driven by rising digital literacy among the population, although infrastructural and regulatory challenges continue to demand serious attention. This phenomenon has generated a massive volume of user review data that contains highly valuable insights into user perceptions, experiences, and overall satisfaction with telemedicine services. Sentiment analysis of these reviews serves as a powerful tool for service providers to gather actionable feedback on their offerings. This paper introduces a novel dataset, named the Indonesian Telemedicine User Review Dataset for Sentiment Analysis. The dataset comprises over 19,680 rows of user reviews sourced from the three most prominent telemedicine applications in Indonesia. Two human annotators annotated the dataset, strictly adhering to guidelines rigorously validated by domain experts in Psychology. Specifically, the dataset contains 14,748 positive reviews, 711 neutral reviews, and 4,221 negative reviews. Ultimately, this dataset serves as a foundational resource to foster future innovations and advancements in sentiment analysis.

Indexed as

Health informaticsIndonesian language corpusIndonesian telemedicineNatural language processingTelemedicine user reviewText classificationWeighted sentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID42725056
PMCPMC13560530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.