ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Evidence Summary for Early-Stage Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence for early-stage (and pre-operative) rehabilitation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, thereby providing an evidence-based foundation for the future development of early rehabilitation protocols. Methods: Based on the "6S" evidence-based model, we systematically searched domestic and international guideline websites, websites of relevant professional societies and Chinese and international databases. Sources included clinical decisions, guidelines, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, expert consensuses, and randomized controlled trials. The search covered all records from the time of establishment to January 2026. Literature screening was subsequently performed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two researchers independently evaluated the literature quality and extracted and summarised the evidence. Results: A total of 18 studies were included, consisting of 2 clinical decisions, 3 guidelines, 3 systematic reviews, 3 expert consensuses, 2 evidence summaries, and 5 randomized controlled trials. Based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model, we extracted evidence and summarized a total of 27 best-evidence items across the following eight aspects: definition and goals, assessment, psychological intervention, pain and swelling management, range of motion recovery, restoring muscle function, brace use and gait training, and follow-up. Conclusion: This study summarized the best evidence for early-stage rehabilitation in ACLR patients, providing preliminary guidance for practice. Implementation requires individualization based on graft type, concomitant procedures, baseline activity level, and postoperative complications; moreover, its clinical efficacy and safety warrant further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.