Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724985›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Fin Whale (

Dana L Adcock, Douglas P Nowacek, Susan E Parks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dana L AdcockDepartment of Biology Syracuse University Syracuse New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-8222
Douglas P NowacekNicholas School of the Environment & Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University Marine Lab Beaufort North Carolina USA.
Susan E ParksDepartment of Biology Syracuse University Syracuse New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predators select foraging habitats to maximise energetic gains. However, habitat fragmentation can lead to increased costs from disturbances in high traffic urban environments. Understanding behavioural drivers of movement ecology is crucial for minimising conflict between evolutionarily selected foraging behaviours and novel anthropogenic stressors. In this study, 27 high-resolution biologging tags were deployed on fin whales in a shallow inner-shelf habitat south of the US east coast, where water depth can be less than the body length of the animal. The vertical movement patterns of the whales from diving overlapped with major shipping traffic. The whales spent > 67% of their time at depths shallower than the drafts of large ships (~10 m). The whales fed primarily during the day and remained very shallow at night (mean 5 m) while resting and travelling, possibly due to diel changes in vertical prey distribution. This natural behavioural pattern has become maladaptive with the introduction of anthropogenic traffic and puts them at extreme risk of injury and mortality in commercial shipping lanes at night, when mariners have limited visibility to detect them. These results underscore the importance of understanding baseline vertical movement patterns and behavioural trends to inform conservation efforts in fragmented environments.

Indexed as

behavioural ecologyconservationfin whaleforaging ecologyhabitat fragmentationtraffic

Identifiers

PMID42724985
PMCPMC13561636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.