ReviewGastro hep advances2026
Nonendoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus: Current Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions.
Review in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has steadily risen over the past several decades. Screening for EAC and its metaplastic precursor, Barrett's esophagus (BE), remains a challenge to prevent EAC development and decrease EAC-attributed mortality. Unfortunately, most BE is diagnosed at the time of diagnosis of EAC in the majority of patients with EAC, showcasing that current screening paradigms are neither widely accepted nor adequate. Historically, screening for BE with upper endoscopy was endorsed by major gastrointestinal society guidelines in the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and related risk factors. However, this method has limitations, including accessibility, cost, and tolerability. Nonendoscopic technologies, such as swallowable cell collection devices, methylated DNA marker assays, esophageal capsule endoscopy, and emerging molecular and physiologic biomarkers, represent newer technologies that may offset many of the limitations of traditional endoscopic screening and facilitate translation to broader settings to capture higher-risk patients. In this review article, we aim to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date summary of nonendoscopic screening tools for BE, contextualizing their advantages, limitations, and prospects for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.