Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724946›Full record

ReviewGastro hep advances2026

Nonendoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus: Current Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions.

Ankoor H Patel, Michael Ma, Petros C Benias, Molly Stewart, Arvind J Trindade

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankoor H PatelDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Michael MaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Petros C BeniasDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Molly StewartDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Arvind J TrindadeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has steadily risen over the past several decades. Screening for EAC and its metaplastic precursor, Barrett's esophagus (BE), remains a challenge to prevent EAC development and decrease EAC-attributed mortality. Unfortunately, most BE is diagnosed at the time of diagnosis of EAC in the majority of patients with EAC, showcasing that current screening paradigms are neither widely accepted nor adequate. Historically, screening for BE with upper endoscopy was endorsed by major gastrointestinal society guidelines in the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and related risk factors. However, this method has limitations, including accessibility, cost, and tolerability. Nonendoscopic technologies, such as swallowable cell collection devices, methylated DNA marker assays, esophageal capsule endoscopy, and emerging molecular and physiologic biomarkers, represent newer technologies that may offset many of the limitations of traditional endoscopic screening and facilitate translation to broader settings to capture higher-risk patients. In this review article, we aim to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date summary of nonendoscopic screening tools for BE, contextualizing their advantages, limitations, and prospects for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Barrett EsophagusDysplasiaEsophageal AdenocarcinomaNonendoscopicScreeningSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID42724946
PMCPMC13559814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.