ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Mechanical complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review article.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) represents a prevalent valvular heart disease, particularly affecting the elderly population, with substantial implications for morbidity and mortality. This review examines the epidemiology, pathophysiology, management strategies, complications, and future implications of AS and its treatment modalities, focusing primarily on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prevalence of AS is rising as the population ages, with notable differences observed across various demographic groups and regions. Additionally, AS can also occur in younger adults, typically due to a bicuspid aortic valve, the most common congenital heart defect, which further contributes to the condition's growing clinical significance. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has historically been the standard treatment for severe AS, but TAVR methods have emerged as a less invasive alternative, particularly for high-risk surgical candidates. SAVR has historically been the standard treatment for severe AS, but TAVR has undergone rapid evolution and widespread acceptance, with over 200 000 procedures performed globally. Various delivery routes for TAVR exist, each with its advantages and limitations, including transfemoral, subclavian, direct aortic, transapical, and transcarotid approaches. Complications associated with TAVR include vascular complications, stroke, conduction disturbances, coronary artery obstruction, acute kidney injury, infections, and others. Strategies for complication prevention and management are actively researched and implemented. The review also discusses future implications of TAVR, highlighting advancements in device technology, procedural techniques, patient selection criteria, and the expanding patient population eligible for TAVR. Despite challenges and complications, TAVR has revolutionized the treatment landscape for AS and offers hope for patients previously deemed unsuitable for surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.