Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42724801›Full record

ReviewChem circularity2026

Dissolution-redeposition dynamics as a universal restructuring mechanism of electrocatalysts.

Blaž Tomc, Milutin Smiljanić, Mitja Kostelec, Mejrema Nuhanović, Muhammad Zahid, Leonard Moriau, Ana Rebeka Kamšek, Aleš Marsel, Miha Hotko, Nik Maselj and 17 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chem circularity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Blaž TomcNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Milutin SmiljanićNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mitja KostelecNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mejrema NuhanovićNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Muhammad ZahidNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Leonard MoriauNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ana Rebeka KamšekNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleš MarselNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Miha HotkoNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nik MaseljNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ante MatošinNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ana HercegNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Lazar BijelićNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ožbej VodebNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anja LogarNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Madis LüsiNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jan OcepekNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Angelja Kjara SurcaNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Črtomir DonikInstitute of Metals and Technology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Irena PaulinInstitute of Metals and Technology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matjaž GodecInstitute of Metals and Technology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Luka SuhadolnikNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Francisco Ruiz-ZepedaNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Primož JovanovičNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Martin ŠalaNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marjan BeleNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nejc HodnikNational Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocatalysts are often assumed to be structurally stable; yet in practice, they continuously dissolve and restructure, directly affecting the number and nature of active sites and therefore performance. Although dissolution-redeposition-driven evolution is well recognized in some electrocatalysis communities, others still interpret activity and selectivity as properties of static surfaces. We argue that across electrocatalytic technologies, especially under demanding industrially relevant timescales, "static" electrocatalysts are a myth: even parts-per-billion metal fluxes can cumulatively change surface structure, poison membranes, degrade supports, and thus shift device performance. Controlling these changes requires a mechanistic understanding of when dissolution, transport, and redeposition are promoted or suppressed by, for instance, potential, pH, reactants, or local microenvironments. Here, we unify evidence for restructuring across metal and metal-derived catalysts under various electrochemical reactions, highlight common driving forces, and summarize the appropriate tools to quantify it. Ultimately, electrocatalysts should be evaluated, designed, and interpreted as dynamically stable materials and not as static electrochemical interfaces.

Indexed as

dissolutionelectrocatalysiselectrolysisfuel cellmetalsOstwald ripeningrecyclingredepositionstructure-property relationshiptransient dissolution

Identifiers

PMID42724801
PMCPMC13561032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.