ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Railway curve squeal prediction using environmental variables.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Curve squeal is a loud tonal noise from railway traffic that contributes to environmental noise pollution. Squealing arises from friction-induced vibrations in the wheel-rail contact during vehicle curving under specific friction conditions. Environmental factors are known to influence these friction conditions and, consequently, the tendency of squeal occurrence. This study investigates whether environmental variables measured from the wayside of the track can be used to predict curve squeal using machine learning models. Methods: Separate prediction models were developed for low-rail and high-rail squeal using a labeled dataset collected during a 19-month measurement campaign at a commuter railway curve in Sweden. Multiple machine learning algorithms were evaluated, and feature importance analysis was used to investigate the environmental predictors associated with low-rail and high-rail squeal. The practical usefulness of the prediction models was further assessed for adaptive top-of-rail friction modifier (TOR-FM) application. Results: Environmental variables contained useful predictive information regarding curve squeal occurrence, although the overall predictive performance remained limited. The tree-based ensemble models generally achieved the highest performance, while the feature importance analysis indicated that low-rail and high-rail squeal relied on different feature patterns. The operational assessment demonstrated that the prediction models could reduce unnecessary TOR-FM triggering while maintaining high squeal detection rates. Discussion: The results demonstrate the potential of combining environmental monitoring with machine learning to support site-specific predictive railway noise mitigation and maintenance decision-making. The differences between low-rail and high-rail prediction further indicate the value of treating the two squeal types as separate prediction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.